So a few days ago I went to Mcdonalds with my boyfriend. We ordered 12 snack wraps [Don't ask] and patiently waited for our order.
Then we get our order, and we start to leave and my boyfriend says, "Let me count it, just in case." It turns out we only got 8 snack wraps. So we go back and tell the lady that we ordered and paid for 12 snack wraps, and she only gave us 8. She stares at us for a minute, and repeats what I said. Then she goes back with our bag and looks around stupidly and tells someone that we ordered 12 and we got 8. [Even though it was her fault.]
So we wait some more and she comes back with two bags. We say thank you and start to leave, and then my boyfriend starts counting them. Then he realizes, the lady split up our 8 snack wraps, put 4 of them in each bag, and gave it to us. I was like, "Are you serious????"
So we get on the line AGAIN. Then the lady comes out with another bag and says "Here," and leaves. It was the last 4 snack wraps.
Sometimes I really hate McDonalds.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
MONEY ISN'T EVERYTHING
So all my close friends know that to me, success means being happy. Not having a big house and cars and a rich husband and being famous.
Unfortunately, all my family members, seeing as how none of them even went to college, think that I should go for the best job possible, or in their words, "doctor" and "lawyer". I was talking to my aunt a few minutes ago and somehow this whole discussion came up. Basically she was saying, "MONEY IS IMPORTANT!" and I was like, "no." And then we started arguing.
Then she was implying that unless I get a high paying job I'm gonna be poor. I was like,
"I'm not gonna be poor".
"No? NO? What are you gonna do then???"
"I'm gonna be a teacher."
"*cardiac arrest* A TEACHER?"
"Yeah."
"No, you're not gonna be no damn teacher."
"Why not? What's wrong with it?"
"YOU'RE DOWNGRADING YOURSELF!!!"
"Um, that's what I wanna do."
Then she started talking about how I was good at the guitar and singing and writing and I said that's not what I want to do. Apparently she wants to control my life. Then she had the nerve to say, "Whoever did this to you is truly evil!"
W. T. F.
WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL????
Then I told her she was being materialistic and rude for putting my dreams down, and she denied she was being mean and what not.
I was trying not to be mean, because she's my aunt and everything, but seriously. I was PISSED OFF.
Then she had the AUDACITY to say that I'M materialistic and a little kid for whining about cowboy boots and my guitar. You know how I've wanted these things forever? Then I was like, "If I was an adult I wouldn't be "whining" about this stuff. I'm not an adult yet, I'm allowed to "whine"." Amirite, or amirite?
Then she said she was "shocked" and what not, and I was shocked too. I didn't know how materialistic people can be. Really, what's the big deal? I want to know. I'm pissed off, and confused as to why this should practically give her a heart attack.
Then she was like, "All those successful people always had someone there pushing them and believing in them, and I'm trynna be that to you, but..." Then I said, "Well when you're "pushing" me to do something that I don't wanna do, then I'm not going to end up successful, am I?" Then she got mad cause she hates when she can't think of something to say cause her head hurts from thinking.
But anyway, basically what I'm trying to say is that everyone should be who they wanna be, and that money means nothing, happiness is everything. [Well, to me, anyway.]
<3
Unfortunately, all my family members, seeing as how none of them even went to college, think that I should go for the best job possible, or in their words, "doctor" and "lawyer". I was talking to my aunt a few minutes ago and somehow this whole discussion came up. Basically she was saying, "MONEY IS IMPORTANT!" and I was like, "no." And then we started arguing.
Then she was implying that unless I get a high paying job I'm gonna be poor. I was like,
"I'm not gonna be poor".
"No? NO? What are you gonna do then???"
"I'm gonna be a teacher."
"*cardiac arrest* A TEACHER?"
"Yeah."
"No, you're not gonna be no damn teacher."
"Why not? What's wrong with it?"
"YOU'RE DOWNGRADING YOURSELF!!!"
"Um, that's what I wanna do."
Then she started talking about how I was good at the guitar and singing and writing and I said that's not what I want to do. Apparently she wants to control my life. Then she had the nerve to say, "Whoever did this to you is truly evil!"
W. T. F.
WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL????
Then I told her she was being materialistic and rude for putting my dreams down, and she denied she was being mean and what not.
I was trying not to be mean, because she's my aunt and everything, but seriously. I was PISSED OFF.
Then she had the AUDACITY to say that I'M materialistic and a little kid for whining about cowboy boots and my guitar. You know how I've wanted these things forever? Then I was like, "If I was an adult I wouldn't be "whining" about this stuff. I'm not an adult yet, I'm allowed to "whine"." Amirite, or amirite?
Then she said she was "shocked" and what not, and I was shocked too. I didn't know how materialistic people can be. Really, what's the big deal? I want to know. I'm pissed off, and confused as to why this should practically give her a heart attack.
Then she was like, "All those successful people always had someone there pushing them and believing in them, and I'm trynna be that to you, but..." Then I said, "Well when you're "pushing" me to do something that I don't wanna do, then I'm not going to end up successful, am I?" Then she got mad cause she hates when she can't think of something to say cause her head hurts from thinking.
But anyway, basically what I'm trying to say is that everyone should be who they wanna be, and that money means nothing, happiness is everything. [Well, to me, anyway.]
<3
Thursday, August 27, 2009
It's A Man's Instinct To Be Chivalrous To A Dainty Woman: Gender Roles, Who's Fault Is It?
Women want classic chivalry. Of course. They want independence, equality, and self-control, of course. But sometimes the two don't come hand in hand. Do women know what men consider to be "chivalry"?
Like most of these topics, this won't be just about how men don't treat women equally. This whole topic involves many, many other things, especially things that women do to maximize the "perfect woman" image. Yes, it's also women's fault. [Keep in mind, I'm not choosing any sides, I'm just reporting as I see it.]
Part I: A Woman's Image
Women wear makeup. Frilly dresses. Do their nails. Shave their legs, armpits, wax every other hair on their body. Get disgusted by the things that men do when they're with their friends, like burping, or the things they talk about.
Many of these things are seen by men as a sign of weakness, or a fault, as to why they should be treated like they're something fragile, delicate. Like the dresses, and the nails. I'm not sure about the makeup, because some men see this as a doll-like quality, but others don't.
Because they look so delicate and dainty, something in a man's mind says, "Let me get those bags for her." Or "Let me open the door for her." Or even something like, "No, you can't help me with this, this is a man's job." It's a man's instinct to treat a woman like she's too dainty for something, especially when she looks the part.
Women try so hard to look perfect, and then get angry when a man treats her what he would call, being a gentleman. But men and women think chivalry are different things.
My boyfriend thinks chivalry is not letting me hold any bags and not letting me walk on the outside of the sidewalk. It makes me mad sometimes, but it's just instinct for some guys. It's not instinct for women to spend hours on their appearance, or sacrificing needs, i.e. being able to wipe your ass, just for pretty, long, perfect acrylic nails, or any other thing like that. Women need to understand that they can't whine about equality while they're making themselves up to be porcelain dolls, for people on the street to admire, for their boyfriends to proudly take their arm.
Part II: A Man's Perspective
Like I've stated before, it's a man's instinct to be chivalrous. The point is, women and men obviously think differently, and they think different of chivalry.
With women, chivalry is, you know, the basic stuff, like holding open doors, letting her have the seat on the bus or train, paying for her, protecting her from harm, etc.
With men, however, chivalry is basically a gender role. Women are "not allowed" to do some things because they're "a mans job". For example, doing the mechanical work, or insisting on holding her bags because they're, apparently, too heavy for a woman. Men would say it's just common courtesy. Women would say it's sexism, the idea that women are too dainty and delicate to do certain things.
Part III: Society's Teachings
What would you say if you saw a man with hairy legs, hairy armpits, facial hair, and arm hair? Nothing, that's just natural.
What if you saw a woman, with hairy legs? Hairy armpits? Bushy eyebrows? You'd probably be disgusted, regardless of whether you're a man or a woman.
This somehow means that hair is a man thing. [Except on your head, of course.] If I asked why it's a man thing, you'd say, because it looks disgusting on a woman.
Why? What makes hair so manly? Do you think that before, like when everyone lived in huts, that people cared about things like armpit hair on a woman? Why is body hair considered a "man thing"?
If you can't come up with an answer to that, then you can probably see how easy it is for the media to convince people of certain things, especially when it comes to gender roles.
Society is, basically, the reason why men think women are inferior to them, or weaker, more delicate and fragile. Which is why men treat women the way they do.
Part IV: So Who's Fault Is It?
It's everyone's fault!!!
<3
Like most of these topics, this won't be just about how men don't treat women equally. This whole topic involves many, many other things, especially things that women do to maximize the "perfect woman" image. Yes, it's also women's fault. [Keep in mind, I'm not choosing any sides, I'm just reporting as I see it.]
Part I: A Woman's Image
Women wear makeup. Frilly dresses. Do their nails. Shave their legs, armpits, wax every other hair on their body. Get disgusted by the things that men do when they're with their friends, like burping, or the things they talk about.
Many of these things are seen by men as a sign of weakness, or a fault, as to why they should be treated like they're something fragile, delicate. Like the dresses, and the nails. I'm not sure about the makeup, because some men see this as a doll-like quality, but others don't.
Because they look so delicate and dainty, something in a man's mind says, "Let me get those bags for her." Or "Let me open the door for her." Or even something like, "No, you can't help me with this, this is a man's job." It's a man's instinct to treat a woman like she's too dainty for something, especially when she looks the part.
Women try so hard to look perfect, and then get angry when a man treats her what he would call, being a gentleman. But men and women think chivalry are different things.
My boyfriend thinks chivalry is not letting me hold any bags and not letting me walk on the outside of the sidewalk. It makes me mad sometimes, but it's just instinct for some guys. It's not instinct for women to spend hours on their appearance, or sacrificing needs, i.e. being able to wipe your ass, just for pretty, long, perfect acrylic nails, or any other thing like that. Women need to understand that they can't whine about equality while they're making themselves up to be porcelain dolls, for people on the street to admire, for their boyfriends to proudly take their arm.
Part II: A Man's Perspective
Like I've stated before, it's a man's instinct to be chivalrous. The point is, women and men obviously think differently, and they think different of chivalry.
With women, chivalry is, you know, the basic stuff, like holding open doors, letting her have the seat on the bus or train, paying for her, protecting her from harm, etc.
With men, however, chivalry is basically a gender role. Women are "not allowed" to do some things because they're "a mans job". For example, doing the mechanical work, or insisting on holding her bags because they're, apparently, too heavy for a woman. Men would say it's just common courtesy. Women would say it's sexism, the idea that women are too dainty and delicate to do certain things.
Part III: Society's Teachings
What would you say if you saw a man with hairy legs, hairy armpits, facial hair, and arm hair? Nothing, that's just natural.
What if you saw a woman, with hairy legs? Hairy armpits? Bushy eyebrows? You'd probably be disgusted, regardless of whether you're a man or a woman.
This somehow means that hair is a man thing. [Except on your head, of course.] If I asked why it's a man thing, you'd say, because it looks disgusting on a woman.
Why? What makes hair so manly? Do you think that before, like when everyone lived in huts, that people cared about things like armpit hair on a woman? Why is body hair considered a "man thing"?
If you can't come up with an answer to that, then you can probably see how easy it is for the media to convince people of certain things, especially when it comes to gender roles.
Society is, basically, the reason why men think women are inferior to them, or weaker, more delicate and fragile. Which is why men treat women the way they do.
Part IV: So Who's Fault Is It?
It's everyone's fault!!!
<3
Monday, August 24, 2009
Magazine/Internet Love Quizzes [And Why They Suck]
You know those quizzes that come in those magazines, titled things like "Is It True Love?", "Is He A Cheater?", "Do Guys Find You Attractive?", etc.? Yeah well I've read quite a few of them and I find that they're absolutely RIDICULOUS.
Exhibit A:
"Is It True Love?"
[A quiz in CosmoGirl]
Almost all the questions are ridiculous, but here are a few that shouldn't have even been in there:
1:
"The first time you met your boyfriend you felt:
A. Psyched! He was really cute!
B. Surprised, you felt like you knew him.
C. Intrigued; you wanted to learn more."
Here's the problem:
First off, first impressions are not always right. For example, when my aunt met her late husband she DESPISED him. She hated him for a couple of years, actually. And what happens? They ended up getting married and having kids.
So explain to me; How is your first impression of your boyfriend supposed to determine if it's true love or not? There's no such thing as love at first sight.
2:
"You mention that Fall Out Boy is playing soon. What does your guy say?
A. "I already got tickets for us."
B. "Oh, I'll have to keep it in mind."
C. "Maybe we should go.""
This question is seriously stupid. First off, mentioning that you want to see Fall Out Boy and your boyfriend's reaction depends on whether he even LIKES the band. For example, if I "mentioned" to my boyfriend that a certain band is "playing soon", seeing as how he hates my music, he'd probably just say, "Oh, okay. You gonna go?" Secondly, implying that whether or not your boyfriend buys you tickets to a concert determines whether it's true love or not is retarded. What does love have to do with music?
Now from another quiz called "Are You And Your Boyfriend Too Serious?"
1:
"You're at a show and a hottie starts chatting you up. You:
A. Flirt and later glance at his Myspace profile, but that's it.
B. Give out your digits. You're not married or anything, right?
C. Quickly say, "My sweetie loves this band but he was busy tonight.""
We all know that in certain quizzes there are "right" and "wrong" answers even though you're supposed to be analyzing from your own personal experience, especially in quizzes like these. There's usually a Right answer, the Neutral answer, and the Wrong answer. I don't have to tell you which on is which, right? The problem with THAT is that if I dated someone long enough to call them my "boyfriend", I'd say something close to C, although we know that's the "Wrong" answer. The ideal answer would be A or B, but I would consider that foul play. The whole point of these quizzes is for you to put yourself in these hypothetical situations, right? Doing so, I'd consider B to be completely wrong, and A is still bad. I just imagine my boyfriend finding out I was flirting with another guy and we exchanged Myspaces.
2:
"You write a letter to your grandparents. What topic takes up the most space?
A. Catching them up on the rest of your family.
B. School and extracurricular activites.
C. Whoever you're dating."
My problem with THIS question is not the fact that it has nothing to do with being "too serious", but that it's just creepy and stupid. To begin with, even if I was married, I wouldn't write my grandparents a letter all about my husband. Obviously I'd be "catching them up on the rest of the family". Sure, I'd include a few bits about him, but choice A is like, the international right answer for everyone.
And now: "Is your boyfriend a cheater?"
1: "One of your friends did something hurtful and you tell him about it. He:
A. Thinks of possible justifications for her behavior.
B. Says it's a bummer.
C. Listens, asks questions, and sympathizes."
What does this have to do with cheating??? The variables involved in cheating are:
Boyfriend + Hot Girl + Physical/Emotional intimacy - Girlfriend = Cheating.
Not only that, but I can't even think of which of the answers are Right and Wrong. You know why??? Because this has nothing to do with cheating.
2: "To your knowledge, has he cheated before?
A. Yes
B. You're not sure
C. No
Is there even anything to say about this question?
First off, if he has, in fact, cheated on you before, then you're stupid. On the other hand, whether he's cheated on you or not doesn't determine whether he'll cheat on you. There's a first time for everything.
There are MANY MANY MANY more quizzes that I could criticize, but I think I'm done with my rant now.
=]
<3
Exhibit A:
"Is It True Love?"
[A quiz in CosmoGirl]
Almost all the questions are ridiculous, but here are a few that shouldn't have even been in there:
1:
"The first time you met your boyfriend you felt:
A. Psyched! He was really cute!
B. Surprised, you felt like you knew him.
C. Intrigued; you wanted to learn more."
Here's the problem:
First off, first impressions are not always right. For example, when my aunt met her late husband she DESPISED him. She hated him for a couple of years, actually. And what happens? They ended up getting married and having kids.
So explain to me; How is your first impression of your boyfriend supposed to determine if it's true love or not? There's no such thing as love at first sight.
2:
"You mention that Fall Out Boy is playing soon. What does your guy say?
A. "I already got tickets for us."
B. "Oh, I'll have to keep it in mind."
C. "Maybe we should go.""
This question is seriously stupid. First off, mentioning that you want to see Fall Out Boy and your boyfriend's reaction depends on whether he even LIKES the band. For example, if I "mentioned" to my boyfriend that a certain band is "playing soon", seeing as how he hates my music, he'd probably just say, "Oh, okay. You gonna go?" Secondly, implying that whether or not your boyfriend buys you tickets to a concert determines whether it's true love or not is retarded. What does love have to do with music?
Now from another quiz called "Are You And Your Boyfriend Too Serious?"
1:
"You're at a show and a hottie starts chatting you up. You:
A. Flirt and later glance at his Myspace profile, but that's it.
B. Give out your digits. You're not married or anything, right?
C. Quickly say, "My sweetie loves this band but he was busy tonight.""
We all know that in certain quizzes there are "right" and "wrong" answers even though you're supposed to be analyzing from your own personal experience, especially in quizzes like these. There's usually a Right answer, the Neutral answer, and the Wrong answer. I don't have to tell you which on is which, right? The problem with THAT is that if I dated someone long enough to call them my "boyfriend", I'd say something close to C, although we know that's the "Wrong" answer. The ideal answer would be A or B, but I would consider that foul play. The whole point of these quizzes is for you to put yourself in these hypothetical situations, right? Doing so, I'd consider B to be completely wrong, and A is still bad. I just imagine my boyfriend finding out I was flirting with another guy and we exchanged Myspaces.
2:
"You write a letter to your grandparents. What topic takes up the most space?
A. Catching them up on the rest of your family.
B. School and extracurricular activites.
C. Whoever you're dating."
My problem with THIS question is not the fact that it has nothing to do with being "too serious", but that it's just creepy and stupid. To begin with, even if I was married, I wouldn't write my grandparents a letter all about my husband. Obviously I'd be "catching them up on the rest of the family". Sure, I'd include a few bits about him, but choice A is like, the international right answer for everyone.
And now: "Is your boyfriend a cheater?"
1: "One of your friends did something hurtful and you tell him about it. He:
A. Thinks of possible justifications for her behavior.
B. Says it's a bummer.
C. Listens, asks questions, and sympathizes."
What does this have to do with cheating??? The variables involved in cheating are:
Boyfriend + Hot Girl + Physical/Emotional intimacy - Girlfriend = Cheating.
Not only that, but I can't even think of which of the answers are Right and Wrong. You know why??? Because this has nothing to do with cheating.
2: "To your knowledge, has he cheated before?
A. Yes
B. You're not sure
C. No
Is there even anything to say about this question?
First off, if he has, in fact, cheated on you before, then you're stupid. On the other hand, whether he's cheated on you or not doesn't determine whether he'll cheat on you. There's a first time for everything.
There are MANY MANY MANY more quizzes that I could criticize, but I think I'm done with my rant now.
=]
<3
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Invisible Flaws
I have noticed recently that everyone has something that they do or have on them that they don't know about. It's kinda hard to explain. But for example, some people may smell horrible and not even know it. Or some people might be veryyyy annoying and everyone hates them and they don't know it. There's kinda two parts to this post, so I'll try my best to explain it as best as I can, seeing as how my brain knows what I'm saying even before I finish my sentence, but obviously you guys don't.
Well to begin with, It seems like I'm the only normal person in the street. Normal for lack of better term, by the way. For example, some people just don't know how the hell to walk. They wail their arms around, stand in the middle of the street while people are trying to walk, walk while looking in another direction until they practically run someone over, etc. It never occurred to me until today that I never do these things.
Another thing, some people have the worst spelling and grammar. It's like, How don't you see that mistake??? Some people can't write one sentence without misspelling almost every word. Don't you people notice these things???
Also, some people may have stuff on their face or on their body that they never notice. For example, I used to know this girl who had the worst food buildup in her teeth. Like, do you seriously not see that???
These are just a few of the things that I notice people do that somehow I never do. Is it just me? Or do I do stuff like this too but no one ever tells me? If I do, please tell me. I don't wanna be like these people o_o
I srsly don't know anyone who doesn't have one of these "Invisible flaws" as I call them. Does anyone else think like this? Cause sometimes I think that all of us feel this way, but because the flaws are invisible we never know about them so we think we're better than others.
<3
Well to begin with, It seems like I'm the only normal person in the street. Normal for lack of better term, by the way. For example, some people just don't know how the hell to walk. They wail their arms around, stand in the middle of the street while people are trying to walk, walk while looking in another direction until they practically run someone over, etc. It never occurred to me until today that I never do these things.
Another thing, some people have the worst spelling and grammar. It's like, How don't you see that mistake??? Some people can't write one sentence without misspelling almost every word. Don't you people notice these things???
Also, some people may have stuff on their face or on their body that they never notice. For example, I used to know this girl who had the worst food buildup in her teeth. Like, do you seriously not see that???
These are just a few of the things that I notice people do that somehow I never do. Is it just me? Or do I do stuff like this too but no one ever tells me? If I do, please tell me. I don't wanna be like these people o_o
I srsly don't know anyone who doesn't have one of these "Invisible flaws" as I call them. Does anyone else think like this? Cause sometimes I think that all of us feel this way, but because the flaws are invisible we never know about them so we think we're better than others.
<3
Saturday, June 6, 2009
TWILIGHT. [My Biggest Rant Yet]
Okay, right now I am very very mad. So please excuse some of the cursing in here.
So a few minutes ago I was watching the rerun of the MTV Movie Awards, which I would like to point out isn't actually a real legit award ceremony, it's just a popularity contest. But anyway, I'm very upset that Twilight won over Slumdog Millionaire in more than one category. Actually, in every category that Twilight has been in, they've won, except for best song, which that hoe Miley Cyrus won, which is almost worse. After today, I cannot watch MTV ever again. it saddens me to know that people who watch MTV like Twilight better than Slumdog Millionaire, and like Miley Cyrus better than A.R. Rahman, who brilliantly wrote the music for Slumdog.
So I casually expressed my resentment that Twilight won "Best Movie" or something, and before I knew it we were arguing about Twilight. What a great way to spend the weekend, right? I told you this weekend was gonna suck.
Fran (4:26:18 PM): Twilight is sexist and abusive.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:27:26 PM): Its not real Fran
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:27:31 PM): I don't see how its sexist
Fran (4:27:46 PM): It's not real but people watch it and read it and it conveys bad morals.
Fran (4:28:27 PM): Bella plays the weak damsel in distress,
Fran (4:28:40 PM): All Bella cares about is Edward,
Fran (4:28:47 PM): He manipulates her into marriage.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:29:18 PM): She wanted to be with him forever because she loved him
Fran (4:29:30 PM): They're not in love, they're infatuated with each other.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:29:38 PM): Yeah they do. They have a choice either to love them back
Fran (4:29:43 PM): if they were in love he wouldn't emotionally abuse her.
This is the kind of stuff that pisses me off, when people think that it's okay for a guy to control and emotionally abuse a girl. Whenever I bring this up the twilight "luvers" say that he does it cause he loves her and that it's not abuse. Well guess what? It is.
Emotional Abuse: Abuse is any behavior that is designed to control and subjugate another human being through the use of fear, humiliation, intimidation, guilt, coercion, manipulation etc. Emotional abuse is any kind of abuse that is emotional rather than physical in nature. It can include anything from verbal abuse and constant criticism to more subtle tactics, such as repeated disapproval or even the refusal to ever be pleased.
This is what Edward does to Bella. This is abuse. But obviously you guys think it's okay and say things like "aww, he cares so much about her". No. He had her kidnapped. What the fuck.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:32:52 PM): That's because nobody knows about vampires and he's trying to let her know that a life with him is a life without the sun because they "sparkle"
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:33:00 PM): She wanted to do it
Fran (4:33:20 PM): so what if she wanted to do it???? THAT MAKES IT EVEN WORSE. do you realize that 12 year old girls read this?
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007(4:33:37 PM): And so, she didn't go to college. She at least graduated from high school.
LMFAO. This is the funniest defense I have ever heard. Just because you want abuse doesn't make it right.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:34:56 PM): Yeah but like I said its not REAL. Its just there for entertainment. Vampires are 'in' again. So what if they read it? Its fiction
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:35:32 PM): And if they're stupid enough to actually believe it then that's their problem.
Fran (4:36:03 PM): dude, i know its fiction. the problem is that people read this and they think its okay. they send bad messages. of course no one is gonna believe it. but if you wrote a fictional book about how slavery is okay, you're saying that its okay because it fiction. right?
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:36:48 PM): Nope. That's why its fiction. Its fake
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:37:21 PM): Slavery was non-fiction. It actually happened. 'Owning' people is just wrong
Fran (4:37:29 PM): dude, you're missing the point.
Fran (4:37:30 PM): DUDE
Fran (4:37:31 PM): LMFAO
Fran (4:37:37 PM): DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS REAL TOO.
Fran (4:37:43 PM): SEXISM IS REAL TOO.
Fran (4:37:44 PM): LMAO
Fran (4:37:47 PM): Wow.
The sentence I love the most:
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:38:25 PM): But he didn't beat her.
o_o
Is there anything to say to that? That's just like WTF. Just because he didn't beat her doesn't make emotional abuse better.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007(4:40:46 PM): I'm trying to understand where you're coming from. I don't see any ounce of sexism in that whole Saga
Fran (4:41:45 PM): you're saying "its okay that the book has bad messages because its fictional and its fake". you honestly don't see any sexism? Bella is a weak character and is controlled by edward. he abuses her, and she makes it seem as if everyone needs a man to control them.
Fran (4:42:06 PM): the thing is
Fran (4:42:13 PM): She doesn't even notice the sexism
Fran (4:42:16 PM): she doesn't notice the abuse
Fran (4:42:22 PM): which makes the whole saga even worse.
Fran (4:42:31 PM): especially since little girls look up to her
Fran (4:43:53 PM): shes stupid, pointless, weak, dependent, and annoying.
Fran (4:47:28 PM): she is the weakest character ever written and she lets edward and everyone else control her.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:48:09 PM): Like mental abuse or what?
Fran (4:48:17 PM): yes, mental abuse!!!!!
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:48:54 PM): Ohhhhhh!
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:49:01 PM): Haha
Fran (4:49:23 PM): and shes supposed to be independent
Fran (4:49:31 PM): but shes obsessed with edward
Fran (4:49:37 PM): and she doesnt care about anything else
Fran (4:49:42 PM): its ridiculous and sexist
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:49:47 PM): But she's like a lovesick puppy
Fran (4:49:54 PM): EXACTLY
Fran (4:49:56 PM): A LOVESICK PUPPY
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:50:05 PM): Hahaha!
Fran (4:50:14 PM): shes like obsessed and controlled by him
Fran (4:50:18 PM): like wtf
Fran (4:50:23 PM): why do you read this shit??
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:50:41 PM): Okay okay. It was entertainment. I like it
Fran (4:51:01 PM): Really???? you cant find any other means of entertainment????? wtf.
So this is the reason I'm so angry. That people have to stoop down to the "Twlight" level to be entertained. I really don't know why people like this crap so much.
For all you guys who like Twilight:
GET A LIFE.
GO READ A REAL BOOK.
STOP FAPPING TO EDWARD.
GO GET HIT BY A TRUCK.
*Picture was removed because it was offensive*
So a few minutes ago I was watching the rerun of the MTV Movie Awards, which I would like to point out isn't actually a real legit award ceremony, it's just a popularity contest. But anyway, I'm very upset that Twilight won over Slumdog Millionaire in more than one category. Actually, in every category that Twilight has been in, they've won, except for best song, which that hoe Miley Cyrus won, which is almost worse. After today, I cannot watch MTV ever again. it saddens me to know that people who watch MTV like Twilight better than Slumdog Millionaire, and like Miley Cyrus better than A.R. Rahman, who brilliantly wrote the music for Slumdog.
So I casually expressed my resentment that Twilight won "Best Movie" or something, and before I knew it we were arguing about Twilight. What a great way to spend the weekend, right? I told you this weekend was gonna suck.
Fran (4:26:18 PM): Twilight is sexist and abusive.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:27:26 PM): Its not real Fran
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:27:31 PM): I don't see how its sexist
Fran (4:27:46 PM): It's not real but people watch it and read it and it conveys bad morals.
Fran (4:28:27 PM): Bella plays the weak damsel in distress,
Fran (4:28:40 PM): All Bella cares about is Edward,
Fran (4:28:47 PM): He manipulates her into marriage.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:29:18 PM): She wanted to be with him forever because she loved him
Fran (4:29:30 PM): They're not in love, they're infatuated with each other.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:29:38 PM): Yeah they do. They have a choice either to love them back
Fran (4:29:43 PM): if they were in love he wouldn't emotionally abuse her.
This is the kind of stuff that pisses me off, when people think that it's okay for a guy to control and emotionally abuse a girl. Whenever I bring this up the twilight "luvers" say that he does it cause he loves her and that it's not abuse. Well guess what? It is.
Emotional Abuse: Abuse is any behavior that is designed to control and subjugate another human being through the use of fear, humiliation, intimidation, guilt, coercion, manipulation etc. Emotional abuse is any kind of abuse that is emotional rather than physical in nature. It can include anything from verbal abuse and constant criticism to more subtle tactics, such as repeated disapproval or even the refusal to ever be pleased.
This is what Edward does to Bella. This is abuse. But obviously you guys think it's okay and say things like "aww, he cares so much about her". No. He had her kidnapped. What the fuck.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:32:52 PM): That's because nobody knows about vampires and he's trying to let her know that a life with him is a life without the sun because they "sparkle"
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:33:00 PM): She wanted to do it
Fran (4:33:20 PM): so what if she wanted to do it???? THAT MAKES IT EVEN WORSE. do you realize that 12 year old girls read this?
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007(4:33:37 PM): And so, she didn't go to college. She at least graduated from high school.
LMFAO. This is the funniest defense I have ever heard. Just because you want abuse doesn't make it right.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:34:56 PM): Yeah but like I said its not REAL. Its just there for entertainment. Vampires are 'in' again. So what if they read it? Its fiction
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:35:32 PM): And if they're stupid enough to actually believe it then that's their problem.
Fran (4:36:03 PM): dude, i know its fiction. the problem is that people read this and they think its okay. they send bad messages. of course no one is gonna believe it. but if you wrote a fictional book about how slavery is okay, you're saying that its okay because it fiction. right?
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:36:48 PM): Nope. That's why its fiction. Its fake
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:37:21 PM): Slavery was non-fiction. It actually happened. 'Owning' people is just wrong
Fran (4:37:29 PM): dude, you're missing the point.
Fran (4:37:30 PM): DUDE
Fran (4:37:31 PM): LMFAO
Fran (4:37:37 PM): DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS REAL TOO.
Fran (4:37:43 PM): SEXISM IS REAL TOO.
Fran (4:37:44 PM): LMAO
Fran (4:37:47 PM): Wow.
The sentence I love the most:
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:38:25 PM): But he didn't beat her.
o_o
Is there anything to say to that? That's just like WTF. Just because he didn't beat her doesn't make emotional abuse better.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007(4:40:46 PM): I'm trying to understand where you're coming from. I don't see any ounce of sexism in that whole Saga
Fran (4:41:45 PM): you're saying "its okay that the book has bad messages because its fictional and its fake". you honestly don't see any sexism? Bella is a weak character and is controlled by edward. he abuses her, and she makes it seem as if everyone needs a man to control them.
Fran (4:42:06 PM): the thing is
Fran (4:42:13 PM): She doesn't even notice the sexism
Fran (4:42:16 PM): she doesn't notice the abuse
Fran (4:42:22 PM): which makes the whole saga even worse.
Fran (4:42:31 PM): especially since little girls look up to her
Fran (4:43:53 PM): shes stupid, pointless, weak, dependent, and annoying.
Fran (4:47:28 PM): she is the weakest character ever written and she lets edward and everyone else control her.
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:48:09 PM): Like mental abuse or what?
Fran (4:48:17 PM): yes, mental abuse!!!!!
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:48:54 PM): Ohhhhhh!
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:49:01 PM): Haha
Fran (4:49:23 PM): and shes supposed to be independent
Fran (4:49:31 PM): but shes obsessed with edward
Fran (4:49:37 PM): and she doesnt care about anything else
Fran (4:49:42 PM): its ridiculous and sexist
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:49:47 PM): But she's like a lovesick puppy
Fran (4:49:54 PM): EXACTLY
Fran (4:49:56 PM): A LOVESICK PUPPY
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:50:05 PM): Hahaha!
Fran (4:50:14 PM): shes like obsessed and controlled by him
Fran (4:50:18 PM): like wtf
Fran (4:50:23 PM): why do you read this shit??
OMGIlovetwilightTwlightLuver007 (4:50:41 PM): Okay okay. It was entertainment. I like it
Fran (4:51:01 PM): Really???? you cant find any other means of entertainment????? wtf.
So this is the reason I'm so angry. That people have to stoop down to the "Twlight" level to be entertained. I really don't know why people like this crap so much.
For all you guys who like Twilight:
GET A LIFE.
GO READ A REAL BOOK.
STOP FAPPING TO EDWARD.
GO GET HIT BY A TRUCK.
*Picture was removed because it was offensive*
Monday, March 2, 2009
4 of Many Depressing TV Shows
4: House
I personally love this show, but the more I get to know the main character, Dr. House, the worse I feel for him. I realized it would suck to be a genius, because then you'd always be mad at everyone around you for being so stupid compared to you, and you'll never be able to find anyone worth being with unless they were on the same level as you.
Think about it.
3: MTV Cribs
Okay, who seriously wants to watch 30 minutes of rich celebrities showing off how rich they are by showing us their home(s)??? Especially since most of the people who watch MTV are middle class people who cannot become rich unless they have some crazy talent. You see people with like 5 cars that they don't even use, and you wish you had money like that. Trust me, after a few episodes, you'll feel like a failure.
2: Toddlers & Tiaras.
First off, let me say these parents are ridiculous. I don't understand how they could think children that look like this are beautiful:

Seriously? It's creepy as hell. I don't think I could ever understand why people think 5-year-olds with tons of makeup on are cute, adorable, pretty, etc.
I think it's gross.
But anyway.
This show really depresses the hell out of me. Those little girls are going to grow up and be so superficial and their parents are definitely going to be in debt. Most people on this show base their lives around making sure their child wins, and they spend up to $5,000 just to (try to) win up to $1,000 and a plastic trophy. Not only do they lose useful money, but child beauty pageants teach little girls that they have to be pretty and wear makeup to get things in life. I'm angry at the judges also, because they're the ones who decide who's the "prettiest".
But it all comes down to the parents. Come on now. Shaving little girls legs? Making them wear fake teeth to hide the only natural childishness they have that they can't cover up with makeup or get rid of? Putting extensions in their hair, fake eyelashes, and don't even get me started on the makeup.

What has the world come to?
How can you not be depressed watching this show???
1: Wife Swap.
Oh man. This show really makes you wonder how many nutcase families there are out there. Today, they were giving like some marathon or something, and usually I can't even watch 5 minutes of it, but today since I was so bored I stuck through the whole marathon.
So for those of you who don't watch Wife Swap, it's basically a show where they take two dysfunctional families and make the wives switch places for two weeks.
Today I think I saw three of the saddest episodes.
In the first one, the families were an obese woman with a husband and son who were addicted to video games and never spoke or went outside, and a strict athletic lady who's whole family was into some sport or the other. So the athletic lady made the husband go to a therapist to help him out with his addiction, and then his son was telling him why he wanted him to get over the addiction. So the little boy says, "I just want us to hang out like we used to. And the only reason I'm trying is cause I don't have anyone else. I don't have any friends around me." And I was just like "AWWW D;" And I seriously almost cried. It was so sad. And then when they showed the ending and if they changed since the show, they did not change at all. This was extremely sad, cause I just think about how that little boy is going to be when he gets older.
The second one I saw was about a woman who treated raising children as a business, and they made everything like boot camp for them. In the neighborhood, the parents actually drew a line (Literally) of where they can't go further down the block. So they never met any other kids in their neighborhood, and they had no friends. They said they felt like dying sometimes and that they were always sad. Then, when the pairs of parents were discussing the week, the mom said, "Our children's happiness is not important, our lives aren't centered around that!" And I was just like, "What kind of parent doesn't care if their child is happy or not???"
The third one was about a family who extremely isolated their kids, and then when the new wife came she went to see the son outside in the yard and she asked him what he was doing and he said, "Nothing, just playing with my stick." because that was the only friend he had. Seriously, man. Then at the end of the show, the new wife finally got him a friend, and he was like, "I guess I can play with my stick once in a while, but now I have a friend, so I can play with him sometimes, too!" And that was just sad.
Yeah, so this is why Wife Swap is the number one depressing show I've seen so far.
I personally love this show, but the more I get to know the main character, Dr. House, the worse I feel for him. I realized it would suck to be a genius, because then you'd always be mad at everyone around you for being so stupid compared to you, and you'll never be able to find anyone worth being with unless they were on the same level as you.
Think about it.
3: MTV Cribs
Okay, who seriously wants to watch 30 minutes of rich celebrities showing off how rich they are by showing us their home(s)??? Especially since most of the people who watch MTV are middle class people who cannot become rich unless they have some crazy talent. You see people with like 5 cars that they don't even use, and you wish you had money like that. Trust me, after a few episodes, you'll feel like a failure.
2: Toddlers & Tiaras.
First off, let me say these parents are ridiculous. I don't understand how they could think children that look like this are beautiful:

Seriously? It's creepy as hell. I don't think I could ever understand why people think 5-year-olds with tons of makeup on are cute, adorable, pretty, etc.
I think it's gross.
But anyway.
This show really depresses the hell out of me. Those little girls are going to grow up and be so superficial and their parents are definitely going to be in debt. Most people on this show base their lives around making sure their child wins, and they spend up to $5,000 just to (try to) win up to $1,000 and a plastic trophy. Not only do they lose useful money, but child beauty pageants teach little girls that they have to be pretty and wear makeup to get things in life. I'm angry at the judges also, because they're the ones who decide who's the "prettiest".
But it all comes down to the parents. Come on now. Shaving little girls legs? Making them wear fake teeth to hide the only natural childishness they have that they can't cover up with makeup or get rid of? Putting extensions in their hair, fake eyelashes, and don't even get me started on the makeup.

What has the world come to?
How can you not be depressed watching this show???
1: Wife Swap.
Oh man. This show really makes you wonder how many nutcase families there are out there. Today, they were giving like some marathon or something, and usually I can't even watch 5 minutes of it, but today since I was so bored I stuck through the whole marathon.
So for those of you who don't watch Wife Swap, it's basically a show where they take two dysfunctional families and make the wives switch places for two weeks.
Today I think I saw three of the saddest episodes.
In the first one, the families were an obese woman with a husband and son who were addicted to video games and never spoke or went outside, and a strict athletic lady who's whole family was into some sport or the other. So the athletic lady made the husband go to a therapist to help him out with his addiction, and then his son was telling him why he wanted him to get over the addiction. So the little boy says, "I just want us to hang out like we used to. And the only reason I'm trying is cause I don't have anyone else. I don't have any friends around me." And I was just like "AWWW D;" And I seriously almost cried. It was so sad. And then when they showed the ending and if they changed since the show, they did not change at all. This was extremely sad, cause I just think about how that little boy is going to be when he gets older.
The second one I saw was about a woman who treated raising children as a business, and they made everything like boot camp for them. In the neighborhood, the parents actually drew a line (Literally) of where they can't go further down the block. So they never met any other kids in their neighborhood, and they had no friends. They said they felt like dying sometimes and that they were always sad. Then, when the pairs of parents were discussing the week, the mom said, "Our children's happiness is not important, our lives aren't centered around that!" And I was just like, "What kind of parent doesn't care if their child is happy or not???"
The third one was about a family who extremely isolated their kids, and then when the new wife came she went to see the son outside in the yard and she asked him what he was doing and he said, "Nothing, just playing with my stick." because that was the only friend he had. Seriously, man. Then at the end of the show, the new wife finally got him a friend, and he was like, "I guess I can play with my stick once in a while, but now I have a friend, so I can play with him sometimes, too!" And that was just sad.
Yeah, so this is why Wife Swap is the number one depressing show I've seen so far.
Friday, February 20, 2009
One Of The Many Unwritten Rules Of Myspace [And Why It's Stupid]
So for those of you Myspace obsessed kidz, you are probably no stranger to this stupid rule that everyone is expected to follow or else they will be shunned from myspace:
"Pc4Pc?"
Okay so everyone knows what pc4pc is; Pic for pic, meaning, "If you comment my pictures I'll return." Or in other words, "Show sum luvv, ya noe i show iit baq".
I bet you 20 bucks that if someone commented your picture right now you'd be like, "Oh noes I have to comment them back" because you think that it's required of you. And those of you who do the commenting, you're probably like, "Oh she has a picture let me comment it so she can comment mines so I can has 100 comments so all my friends* will be jelly." [*Myspace "friends" are not your real friends.]
So what I hate about this "rule" is that since you're practically required to pc4pc, that none of the comments you get are actually genuine. In the young myspace days, if someone commented your picture, it's because they actually do think that top looks cute on you or your hair is nice. But these days, if someone comments your pictures it's because they want MOAR COMMENTS.
What they say:
"Omg you look mad cute<3"
What they're really saying:
"Okay lets cut the crap, since I did you a favor and commented your picture now you have to comment mines. And you look like a fat cow."
If they're reallyyyy desperate, they'll even waste about 10 seconds of their life clicking the "post comment" button as many times as they can so they can "spam" you and you'll have to do the same.
"Spam is the abuse of electronic messaging systems to indiscriminately send unsolicited bulk messages."
-Wikipedia.
So what ends up happening is that someone sends you a comment saying that you're sooo pretty or that they're so jealous of those jeans, when they're really not. They might not even think you're pretty at all. They might think you look like chewed up hamburger meat. But your reaction is, "wow, they think I'm pretty?? =D" And then you go and comment them in return.
I mean, I'm not saying it's bad to comment someone's pictures after they comment yours, it's just that nowadays it's become like a ritual, and you never know if someone really means what they say or if they're doing it for the return comments. It's pretty dishonest, actually. I've seen people who have like 300 comments and I just think to myself, "300 people cannot possibly think you are that fabulous." I mean, they can, but it's just unlikely unless you're some type of celebrity.
And another thing is that people are just obsessed with this stuff. Like, they post sooo many bulletins just for a few comments. Like seriously, guys. Come on now. I thought you were better than this.
With me, if someone comments my pictures, sure, it's a nice gesture, so I'll go check out their pictures to see if they have any nice pictures as well. If they don't have any pictures that I find to be nice, I won't comment them. If they do have a nice picture, I'll comment them. Simple as that. I've had people actually delete their comments from my pictures because I didn't comment theirs. Like, okay, you obviously didn't mean what you said so it doesn't matter anyway.
So yeah. I'd rather choose 2 genuine comments over 1,000 fake ones anyday.
<3
"Pc4Pc?"
Okay so everyone knows what pc4pc is; Pic for pic, meaning, "If you comment my pictures I'll return." Or in other words, "Show sum luvv, ya noe i show iit baq".
I bet you 20 bucks that if someone commented your picture right now you'd be like, "Oh noes I have to comment them back" because you think that it's required of you. And those of you who do the commenting, you're probably like, "Oh she has a picture let me comment it so she can comment mines so I can has 100 comments so all my friends* will be jelly." [*Myspace "friends" are not your real friends.]
So what I hate about this "rule" is that since you're practically required to pc4pc, that none of the comments you get are actually genuine. In the young myspace days, if someone commented your picture, it's because they actually do think that top looks cute on you or your hair is nice. But these days, if someone comments your pictures it's because they want MOAR COMMENTS.
What they say:
"Omg you look mad cute<3"
What they're really saying:
"Okay lets cut the crap, since I did you a favor and commented your picture now you have to comment mines. And you look like a fat cow."
If they're reallyyyy desperate, they'll even waste about 10 seconds of their life clicking the "post comment" button as many times as they can so they can "spam" you and you'll have to do the same.
"Spam is the abuse of electronic messaging systems to indiscriminately send unsolicited bulk messages."
-Wikipedia.
So what ends up happening is that someone sends you a comment saying that you're sooo pretty or that they're so jealous of those jeans, when they're really not. They might not even think you're pretty at all. They might think you look like chewed up hamburger meat. But your reaction is, "wow, they think I'm pretty?? =D" And then you go and comment them in return.
I mean, I'm not saying it's bad to comment someone's pictures after they comment yours, it's just that nowadays it's become like a ritual, and you never know if someone really means what they say or if they're doing it for the return comments. It's pretty dishonest, actually. I've seen people who have like 300 comments and I just think to myself, "300 people cannot possibly think you are that fabulous." I mean, they can, but it's just unlikely unless you're some type of celebrity.
And another thing is that people are just obsessed with this stuff. Like, they post sooo many bulletins just for a few comments. Like seriously, guys. Come on now. I thought you were better than this.
With me, if someone comments my pictures, sure, it's a nice gesture, so I'll go check out their pictures to see if they have any nice pictures as well. If they don't have any pictures that I find to be nice, I won't comment them. If they do have a nice picture, I'll comment them. Simple as that. I've had people actually delete their comments from my pictures because I didn't comment theirs. Like, okay, you obviously didn't mean what you said so it doesn't matter anyway.
So yeah. I'd rather choose 2 genuine comments over 1,000 fake ones anyday.
<3
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
6 Things That Pissed Me Off This Month [Jan. 09]
6: Those checkered scarves that everyone was wearing.
So this whole January, everyone started wearing some weird checkered scarves that weren't even scarves. They look like picnic blankets. Very thin, cheap, picnic blankets.
It started out with the emo kids wearing them, then the ghetto kids liked them, and bought them in every color.
So now everytime I walk into school it looks like no one could afford scarves so they just grabbed the closest tablecloth and stuck it on their neck.

[Above: Prom dress]
5: Winter.
I hate winter. So it's probably gonna be on all my lists of things that piss me off.
4:Katy Perry.
Man, I hate this chick. In January, she came out with some new song called "Thinking Of You" that people also went batshit insane for, along with all her other crap. She has got to stop. First she sings about kissing another girl while having a boyfriend, now it's about being with some other guy and liking some other guy at the same time. And the video is even worse. Come on, now. Your husband is in the army and your cheating on him? Good thing he died, maybe she would have learned her lesson.

3: The kids in my school on inauguration day.
Okay, so for inauguration day, my principal decided to put up a huge screen and take all this kids out of class to watch it. Now, it was supposed to be a pretty historical day and everything, and I thought that because of that, the kids in my school would shut up for once. But they didn't.
-_-

[Above: Equivalent to a day at Tapco.]
2: Miley "Hoe" Cyrus.

It seems like Disney Channel is an underground child porn industry. They just keep rolling out the whores. But the one that just makes me kill babies is Miley Cyrus. D:<
She is just too much. Her pictures are disgusting, her lip syncing skills are horrible, and she is just a whore.


Like seriously, you can't even drive yet.
Gee, I wonder how those pictures got on the interwebz to begin with.
1: Damn Twilight.
I thought after a while people would realize how stupid twilight [Note the uncapitalization]is. But apparently not. People are still having orgasms over it, including Stephanie Meyers, who's whole idea for twilight came from a wet dream of hers.
It's actually very creepy, seeing as how Stephanie Meyer's description of Bella sounds very much like her own, minus 300 pounds.
What's so funny is that not even the actors like twilight. No wonder Kirsten Stweart smokes pot.
Robert Pattinson was quoted saying, "This woman is mad. She’s completely mad and she’s in love with her own fictional creation.’ And sometimes you would feel uncomfortable reading this thing. It’s kind of a sick pleasure in a lot of ways."
LOL WUT.



Not only is it a retarded book, but the book also sets bad examples for its 12 year old fangirls:
-Abusive relationships are okay as long as he's hot and sparkly.
-It's okay to get pregnant and drop out of school.
-Pedophiles are cool.
And many more.
So STFU about twilight, everyone. -_-
So this whole January, everyone started wearing some weird checkered scarves that weren't even scarves. They look like picnic blankets. Very thin, cheap, picnic blankets.
It started out with the emo kids wearing them, then the ghetto kids liked them, and bought them in every color.
So now everytime I walk into school it looks like no one could afford scarves so they just grabbed the closest tablecloth and stuck it on their neck.

[Above: Prom dress]
5: Winter.
I hate winter. So it's probably gonna be on all my lists of things that piss me off.
4:Katy Perry.
Man, I hate this chick. In January, she came out with some new song called "Thinking Of You" that people also went batshit insane for, along with all her other crap. She has got to stop. First she sings about kissing another girl while having a boyfriend, now it's about being with some other guy and liking some other guy at the same time. And the video is even worse. Come on, now. Your husband is in the army and your cheating on him? Good thing he died, maybe she would have learned her lesson.

3: The kids in my school on inauguration day.
Okay, so for inauguration day, my principal decided to put up a huge screen and take all this kids out of class to watch it. Now, it was supposed to be a pretty historical day and everything, and I thought that because of that, the kids in my school would shut up for once. But they didn't.
-_-

[Above: Equivalent to a day at Tapco.]
2: Miley "Hoe" Cyrus.

It seems like Disney Channel is an underground child porn industry. They just keep rolling out the whores. But the one that just makes me kill babies is Miley Cyrus. D:<
She is just too much. Her pictures are disgusting, her lip syncing skills are horrible, and she is just a whore.


Like seriously, you can't even drive yet.
Gee, I wonder how those pictures got on the interwebz to begin with.
1: Damn Twilight.
I thought after a while people would realize how stupid twilight [Note the uncapitalization]is. But apparently not. People are still having orgasms over it, including Stephanie Meyers, who's whole idea for twilight came from a wet dream of hers.
It's actually very creepy, seeing as how Stephanie Meyer's description of Bella sounds very much like her own, minus 300 pounds.
What's so funny is that not even the actors like twilight. No wonder Kirsten Stweart smokes pot.
Robert Pattinson was quoted saying, "This woman is mad. She’s completely mad and she’s in love with her own fictional creation.’ And sometimes you would feel uncomfortable reading this thing. It’s kind of a sick pleasure in a lot of ways."
LOL WUT.



Not only is it a retarded book, but the book also sets bad examples for its 12 year old fangirls:
-Abusive relationships are okay as long as he's hot and sparkly.
-It's okay to get pregnant and drop out of school.
-Pedophiles are cool.
And many more.
So STFU about twilight, everyone. -_-
Friday, January 2, 2009
Kids These Days
It seems like 13 is the new 18 for kids these days. It really pisses me off when people don't act their age.
For Example:
Kids and Dating, or as they like to call it, "Luvvv":
One major thing that pisses me off is kids and their relationships. For example, if 2 kids start dating, they'll be saying to each other "I Love You" by the third day.
Why that pisses me off:
Because you can't just love someone just like that. And kids wouldn't know what love is. They just say it because they see all these couples on the TV and they want something like that. I've seen so many examples of this, and what ends up happening is that they break up like a week later. What's even more annoying is the way the write it and put it everywhere.
ACTUAL TEXT:
"I effin luv u sooo much baby id give ma life 4 u :] 12|28|08"
DATE WRITTEN:
12.30.08.
Am I the only one who sees a problem here???
D:<
What's even worse is that when they break up, usually a couple of days later, they completely forget about that person, and in some cases, even write mean things about them.
It's ridiculous.
Damn society.
-_-
Why can't they just date like regular people? Why jump into something so quick?
Amirite?
For Example:
Kids and Dating, or as they like to call it, "Luvvv":
One major thing that pisses me off is kids and their relationships. For example, if 2 kids start dating, they'll be saying to each other "I Love You" by the third day.
Why that pisses me off:
Because you can't just love someone just like that. And kids wouldn't know what love is. They just say it because they see all these couples on the TV and they want something like that. I've seen so many examples of this, and what ends up happening is that they break up like a week later. What's even more annoying is the way the write it and put it everywhere.
ACTUAL TEXT:
"I effin luv u sooo much baby id give ma life 4 u :] 12|28|08"
DATE WRITTEN:
12.30.08.
Am I the only one who sees a problem here???
D:<
What's even worse is that when they break up, usually a couple of days later, they completely forget about that person, and in some cases, even write mean things about them.
It's ridiculous.
Damn society.
-_-
Why can't they just date like regular people? Why jump into something so quick?
Amirite?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)